Scenario

Enterprise services and SOX-style segregation of duties

Late-stage or public company where every refund over a control threshold needs two named approvers, an evidence chain, and an audit-ready export at quarter end.

Reference numbers

What the math looks like in this pattern.

Illustrative materiality threshold

$10,000

Illustrative

Illustrative approver SLA

1 business day

Illustrative
Before Axiru

The pain we hear about over and over in this pattern.

Configuration

How Axiru is set up for this pattern.

These are the policies a finance or ops team would typically enable on day one. Thresholds shown are illustrative; you tune them to your own materiality.

Two-person approval over materiality threshold

refunds

Refunds above an illustrative $10,000 threshold require two distinct approvers with different roles. The initiator cannot be either approver.

Evidence pack on every above-threshold decision

refunds

Each high-value decision generates a downloadable evidence pack including the policy, the two approvers, the inputs, the timestamps, and the cryptographic hash chain reference.

Quarterly export to GRC system

refunds

Scheduled export of all above-threshold decisions to the company's GRC platform (Workiva, AuditBoard, ServiceNow GRC) in CSV or JSON.

Signals to watch

What you should be measuring once this is running.

What good looks like

The steady state if the configuration is doing its job.

Framing

The shift was not 'we added a control'. The shift was 'the control was real for the first time'. Auditors noticed.

Common operating pattern in public-company finance and GRC
Next step

Run the enterprise services and sox-style segregation of duties simulation on your own data.

Upload 90 days of refund history. Axiru replays these policies in shadow mode. Nothing actually blocks any money until you flip the switch.

Start in shadow mode first. Move to live enforcement later.

Enterprise services and SOX-style segregation of duties | Axiru scenario | Axiru